Páginas del 'blog'

jueves, 27 de agosto de 2020

El Templo Satánico considera al aborto un ritual religioso y, por tanto, exento de regulación legal

El inesperado ascenso del Templo Satánico en Estados Unidos | Blog Doc&Roll  | EL PAÍS


 El Templo Satánico (TST, sus siglas en inglés) ha anunciado que está rifando un aborto gratuito para promover el “ritual de aborto religioso” de la organización, mientras que argumenta que los derechos religiosos de sus miembros están exentos de cualquier ley estatal o cualquier regulación que pueda bloquear el acceso a los servicios de aborto durante el primer trimestre. Según TST, el aborto gratuito puede ser médico o quirúrgico y es transferible a pedido. Lo leemos en Mundo Cristiano.


Con sede en Salem (Massachusetts, EE.UU.), TST describe su nuevo ritual de aborto satánico como una “experiencia espiritual diseñada para infundir confianza y autoestima de acuerdo con las creencias religiosas de TST”. La organización sostiene que quienes practican el ritual del aborto satánico están exentos de estar sujetos a períodos de espera, asesoramiento obligatorio, visualización forzada de ecografías y materiales de lectura como se requiere en muchos estados.


“TST basa sus afirmaciones de exenciones del mandato de aborto en las protecciones proporcionadas por las leyes estatales de restauración de la libertad religiosa o RFRA, que generalmente prohíbe que el gobierno interfiera sustancialmente con el libre ejercicio de la religión de una persona”, dijo TST en un comunicado de prensa.


El Templo Satánico afirma que su ritual de aborto, tal como lo practican sus miembros, está exento de las regulaciones de aborto existentes sobre la base de la libertad religiosa. Señalan el fallo de la Corte Suprema de 2014 de que Hobby Lobby como empresa tenía derecho a no cubrir el control de la natalidad, incluidos los medicamentos abortivos, como parte de su programa de atención médica para sus empleados, debido a sus creencias religiosas que consideraban tal práctica como inmoral.


TST dice que todos los abortos realizados por sus miembros son actos religiosos de satanismo y están protegidos por el fallo. La organización también ha puesto a disposición de todos sus miembros una carta modelo para solicitar una exención religiosa a las restricciones al aborto. Fundado en 2012, TST afirma tener más de 300.000 miembros en todo el mundo.

jueves, 20 de agosto de 2020

Ningún católico puede votar por Joe Biden, candidato demócrata pro-abortista

 

‘No Catholic can vote for Joe Biden’: Pro-life priests explain

'Not only can Catholics not vote for Biden in good conscience, but they can’t vote for Democrats, period.'
Wed Aug 19, 2020 - 9:56 am EST
Featured Image

PETITION: Urge Catholic bishops to refuse Holy Communion to pro-abortion Biden! Sign the petition here.

August 18, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Top pro-life priests in the United States have said that no Catholic can vote for Joe Biden.  Yet, in campaign videos, Joe Biden is touting his Catholicism over and over again. Last week, a U.S. bishop tweeted that Biden is not a Catholic, but homosexuality-promoting priest Fr. James Martin defended him, insisting that he is a Catholic. No surprise there.

But seriously, with all the gaffes, sex abuse scandal, and lies surrounding Joe Biden, how can it be that he was selected to be the Democratic candidate for this all-important election?

Joe Biden? Really? Is that the best candidate the Democrats could come up with for this election, which from both sides is being regarded as the most important election perhaps in U.S. history?

It is so strange that it seems almost like a joke.

But it’s no joke.

His gaffes are remarkable — for someone running for president, surely, but not for someone of his advanced age. 

Even the liberal newspapers and commentators are calling him out for his lies.

His creepy touching and kissing videos are so cringeworthy that I feel like running out of the room when they are played. 

Even hardcore leftists are saying they believe the horrific sexual abuse testimony of his former aide, Tara Reade, but still are going to vote for Biden — in their minds a sexual abuser — nonetheless.

“I don’t want an investigation. I want a coronation of Joe Biden,” declared Martin Tolchin, a former New York Times journalist who helped found The Hill and Politico. “I don’t want justice, whatever that may be. I want a win, the removal of Donald Trump from office.”

Tolchin also expressed fear at the possibility of an investigation revealing “damaging information concerning [Biden’s] relationship with Tara Reade or something else,” such that he was forced to drop out in favor of a weaker Democrat. “Should we really risk the possibility?”

Lisa Bloom, a trial lawyer who previously represented women who claimed that President Donald Trump had sexually harassed them, wrote on Twitter that she believes that Biden assaulted Reade but will support him anyway in order to “fight Trump.”

Her tweet reads: “I believe you, Tara Reade. You have people who remember you told them about this decades ago. We know he is ‘handsy.’ You're not asking for $. You've obviously struggled mightily with this. I still have to fight Trump, so I will still support Joe. But I believe you. And I’m sorry.”

Given all that, you’d be forgiven for thinking it’s shocking that earlier this month, Biden released a second campaign video touting his supposed Catholic faith and friendship with Pope Francis.

LifeSite reporter Paul Smeaton reports that the short video shows Biden and Pope Francis smiling and greeting each other, while a voiceover of Biden speaks about an occasion when the two men met at the Vatican.

Back in February, Biden released a similar campaign video featuring Pope Francis in which Biden says he goes to Mass and says the rosary and that faith is what has helped him through the most difficult moments in his life.

Given Biden’s extreme position on abortion — which, according to the faith he claims to profess, is the murder of innocent babies in the womb — his assertion that he is a Catholic is about as authentic as someone with a penchant for killing puppies claiming to be an animal rights activist.

One U.S. bishop took to Twitter to call out Biden for his fake Catholicism. Bishop Thomas Tobin of Providence, Rhode Island tweeted last week, “Biden-Harris. First time in awhile that the Democratic ticket hasn’t had a Catholic on it. Sad.”

Bishop Tobin’s tweet garnered many anti-Catholic responses, some even accusing the bishop of pedophilia.

It was also not very surprising that homosexuality-promoting Fr. James Martin, who has agreed to speak at the Democrat convention, responded to Bishop Tobin with a false “correction” of the bishop.

“Mr. Biden is a baptized Catholic. Thus, he is a Catholic,” Fr. Martin tweeted.

Well, by definition, Bishop Tobin is correct, and surprise, surprise: Fr. Martin is not.

The 1943 encyclical of Pope Pius XII on the Catholic Church called “The Mystical Body of Christ” defines a member of the Catholic Church specifically to exclude those like Biden who claim to be Catholic but separate themselves from the unity of the true faith.

The encyclical reads at paragraph 22, “Actually only those are to be included as members of the Church who have been baptized and profess the true faith, and who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or been excluded by legitimate authority for grave faults committed.” 

That is also the sentiment of the top pro-life priests in the country.

Fr. Frank Pavone, national director of Priests for Life, told LifeSiteNews that Biden’s “failure to protect the unborn puts him not only in conflict with the Catholic faith but with the Founding principles of America, the very meaning of public service, and basic human decency. You can’t kill babies, and you can’t authorize anyone else to do so.”

Fr. Pavone told LifeSiteNews that “Biden is not living as a Catholic[.] … [A]s for voting, not only can Catholics not vote for Biden in good conscience, but they can’t vote for Democrats, period. And neither can anyone else.”

“It’s time to stop pretending we can be neutral,” he continued. “The Democrat Party has set itself up against the Church, against the unborn, and against America. They do not deserve one ounce of power in this country, and anyone who gives it to them shares the guilt of all the evil they do. And that starts with our religious leaders.”

Fr. Stephen Imbarrato, an activist pro-life Catholic priest, who is also a regular on EWTN and has particpated in a number of Red Rose Rescues, said, “Joe Biden has already, rightfully so, been refused communion.” “He is a walking and talking scandal to his Catholic faith and has rightly been refused the Eucharist because he persists in ongoing mortal sin thus separating himself from communion with the Church. He scandalizes the Catholic faith in so many ways that objectively he actually seems ‘anti Catholic’ in his beliefs.” 

Fr. Imbarrato declared simply, unequivocally, “No Catholic can vote for Joe Biden.”

“I am also begging Catholics to not risk the grave sin of scandal by supporting this man with their vote. Thus we would be heaping more scandal upon more scandal upon scandal.”

“Many people respond to my comments with, ‘what about Trump?’ This is not about Trump. Trump isn’t even Catholic. This is a Catholic issue. A Catholic can’t vote for Biden whether they feel in good conscience they can or can’t vote for Trump,” he added. 

“Between 45 percent and 48 percent of Catholics voted for Hillary Clinton,” Fr. Imbarrato said. “Four years later, the situation with Biden as a Catholic is much worse and the choice is much clearer insofar as not who any Catholic can vote for, but who every Catholic can’t vote for. No Catholic can vote for Joe Biden.”

Joe Biden’s pro-abortion record

Let’s take a look at Biden’s record on life and family — the two top issues for Catholics in political life, as was explained by Pope Benedict XVI while he was still Cardinal Ratzinger under Pope St. John Paul II.

Biden has been upfront about his agenda to ensure the so-called “right” to what he calls women’s reproductive health, by which he means permission to kill babies in the womb. In his Agenda for Women, released in July, Biden promised to restore domestic and overseas funding to the abortion industry cut by Trump.

Biden said he “will work to codify Roe v. Wade, and his Justice Department will do everything in its power to stop the rash of state laws that so blatantly violate Roe v. Wade.”

The largest abortion operation in the USA, Planned Parenthood, has naturally endorsed Biden. In its statement, PP touted the former vice president’s support for expanding access to contraception, increasing legal protections for access to abortion, promoting “comprehensive sex education,” and reversing the Trump administration’s rule prohibiting Title X taxpayer funds from being given to organizations that refer for abortions. Prior to the announcement being made, Alexis McGill Johnson, acting president of Planned Parenthood, told NPR that November’s presidential contest “is literally a life and death election.”

During the coronavirus crisis — where all sorts of medical procedures were suspended due to the pandemic — Biden wanted to ensure the continuation of abortion. “We need to ensure that women have access to all health services during this crisis,” the Democratic presidential candidate said, adding that “abortion is an essential health care service.”

Historically, Biden had a slight qualm with forcing Americans to pay for aborting children abroad, but during the campaign, he flip-flopped on the Hyde Amendment. “If I believe health care is a right, as I do, I can no longer support an amendment that makes that right dependent on someone’s ZIP code,” Biden declared. “I can’t justify leaving millions of women without the access to care they need, and the ability to exercise their constitutionally protected right.”

But Biden’s abortion-pushing is even more extreme. When he traveled to Kenya as vice president in 2010, he urged the then-pro-life government to pass a new constitution that would legalize abortion, bribing them with the promise of funding. “We are hopeful, Barack Obama is hopeful, I am hopeful that you will carry out these reforms to allow money to flow,” Biden told a crowd of Kenyans.

And if that’s not bad enough, Biden was even positive on China’s brutal one-child policy, which, as we all know, included forced abortion and sterilization. In an August address in China in 2011, he said he would not “second-guess” China’s coercive population control policy.

Biden noted that Chinese officials “share a similar concern” with American leaders in terms of a shaky economic outlook. “You have no safety net. Your policy has been one which I fully understand — I’m not second-guessing — of one child per family,” said Biden.

As LifeSite reported at the time, the implementation of China’s one-child policy was notoriously brutal — with women routinely forced to undergo abortions and sterilizations or handed crippling fines and other punishments for “illegal pregnancies.” Human rights activists say as many as 35,000 abortions are performed in China each day, nearly ten times the rate of the United States.

And in case you might think Biden didn’t know of the Chinese one-child policy brutality, Biden was informed by the foremost expert on the program, Steven Mosher, who has personally witnessed forced abortions in China and has spoken with Biden himself on the issue.

“I know that Joe Biden ‘fully understands’ how women are arrested for the ‘crime’ of being pregnant, how they are incarcerated and browbeaten for this ‘crime,’ and how they are forced to undergo abortions and sterilizations. I know because I told him so,” Mosher said at the time.

“While serving as a Commissioner of the U.S. Commission on Broadcasting to China, I briefed then-Senator Biden on population control, Chinese style.” Mosher also accused Biden of “clearly pandering to his Chinese hosts” in brushing off the policy’s moral significance. “This wasn’t ignorance and it wasn’t a gaffe. Biden wanted China’s communist leaders to know that he and the President he serves are more than willing to turn a blind eye to the atrocities committed in the name of the one-child policy,” he said.

On the family issue, Biden has been just as extreme.

Biden himself boasts of having endorsed homosexual “marriage” in 2012, before Barack Obama did.

On August 1, 2016, Biden actually officiated at a homosexual “marriage” ceremony, holding it in the vice president’s residence. He then tweeted out a picture of the two men holding hands as he looked on approvingly. Commenting in the tweet, he said: “Proud to marry [sic] Brian and Joe at my house. Couldn’t be happier, two longtime White House staffers, two great guys.”

Biden announced in June that his top priority if elected will be imposing his so-called “Equality Act.” The actual title of the document is “The Plan to Address LGBTQ Equality in America and Around the World.”

In an incisive analysis of the plan at LIfeSIteNews, Paula Rinehart notes, “The real rub is that sexual orientation and gender identity are granted special legal status with the power to trump religious convictions. Faith-based adoption and foster care agencies would not receive federal grants unless they agreed to place children in same-sex homes.” She explains in Biden’s plan, students would be guaranteed access to bathrooms and locker rooms of their choosing. Conversion therapy becomes a punishable offense. Government forms would be required to have a “third option” for non-binary individuals. It would be legal nightmare to terminate a pastor or Christian schoolteacher who decides to present himself as the opposite sex or live a gay lifestyle. Women’s sports would be dominated by men on hormones.

Biden said in January, one day after the March for Life, which he knows pro-lifers call the civil rights issue of our time, “Let’s be clear: Transgender equality is the civil rights issue of our time.” In that tweet, Biden added: “There is no room for compromise when it comes to basic human rights.”  

James Shupe, a man who underwent radical surgery to change his sex organs and then regretted his actions and attempted to return to normalcy, warned Americans what Biden’s vision for America means.

At LifeSite, you can read that Shupe, who was America’s first legally “non-binary” person and has since reclaimed his male birth sex, offered a short litany about the disastrous impact transgenderism has had on society and, in particular, on women and girls.

“Men in women’s bathrooms with little girls. Males winning 1st place in female sports. Males in women’s homeless shelters. Male predators being placed in female prisons based on ‘feelings’ of being a woman,” tweeted Shupe. “And Biden calls it the civil rights issue of our time. Women do you agree?”

There is much more to say, but let me close by appealing to those Catholics who may disagree with me about the election and feel the need to vote for Biden despite all of that.

At 77, Biden will soon be meeting his Maker. Now is the time to be praying for him to convert, not goading him on to a position where he will do untold harm to the nation and his own soul.

And the perspective of those top pro-life priests in the United States shows true Catholic concern for Biden’s soul — and the souls of the bishops who are failing in their duty to discipline Biden.

Fr. Imbarrato told LifeSiteNews, “A more concerning potential scandal may be that the U.S. bishops have not forthrightly proclaimed [Biden’s defiance of his Catholic faith] — what every Catholic knows yet half choose to ignore because the bishops have ignored it and remain silent about it.” 

“The silence of the U.S. bishops about Joe Biden may even a greater scandal than Biden’s idolatry (by which he places his intrinsically evil political agenda before his Catholicism) because a case can be made that he indulges in such scandal and idolatry because of the tacit approval from our shepherds.”

A few bishops have indeed warned Biden, called him out, even, saying he should be denied Holy Communion. But most have remained silent. That silence shows a real negligence and lack of concern about Biden’s eternal salvation.

St. Paul warns in the Bible about receiving Communion: “Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord” (1 Cor. 11:27). Such a person, says St. Paul, “drinks judgment to himself.”

The head of Human Life International explained in an article posted at LifeSite:

For this reason, the Church urges all Catholics to examine their consciences before receiving the Eucharist, to see if they are guilty of mortal sin. If they are, then the Church teaches they must first go to Confession, and that if they knowingly receive the Eucharist in a state of mortal sin, they commit the further grave sin of sacrilege. In most cases this process of discernment is personal and private. However, the Church also recognizes that there are circumstances in which a minister of the Eucharist must refuse a person Holy Communion, for his own good, and for the good of the whole Church. The circumstances when this is necessary are clearly spelled out in Canon Law. Indeed, Canon 915 could not be any clearer: “Those upon whom the penalty of excommunication or interdict has been imposed or declared, and others who obstinately persist in manifest grave sin, are not to be admitted to Holy Communion.”

There is a petition at LifeSite where over 20,000 people have urged the U.S. bishops to refuse Holy Communion to Biden.

We acknowledge that making a decision to exclude public figures from Holy Communion is not easy. But sometimes, says the petition, this is the only way to make them understand the error of their ways and to preserve the Church from serious scandal.

As one of the petition’s signers myself, I say with all the rest, “We do not hold ourselves up as judges over Joe Biden's eternal soul, but we encourage you to make known one of the consequences of public and obstinate support of abortion by our ‘Catholic’ politicians...pro-abortion politicians, who also proclaim themselves to be ‘Catholic,’ should not think that they can demean the Body of Christ — by promoting killing other human beings — with no consequence.”

In the end, we thank the bishops for taking leadership in this matter, and we pledge to pray for the bishops and for Catholic politicians.

()

martes, 11 de agosto de 2020

La Asamblea N Francesa aprueba el aborto hasta el nacimiento

 

La Asamblea Nacional Francesa ha aprobado varias enmiendas a la ley de bioética de la nación, una de las cuales legalizaría el aborto a demanda hasta el nacimiento.

Por un resultado de 60 votos a favor y 37 en contra, los legisladores acordaron permitir el aborto en cualquier momento para una madre que sufre de "angustia psicosocial", un término nebuloso que permite a los trabajadores de la salud un margen total para aprobar el procedimiento 

La legislación francesa distingue entre l'Interruption volontaire de grossesse (aborto voluntario), que debe realizarse a más tardar en la duodécima semana de embarazo, y l'interruption médicale de grossesse (aborto médico), que puede realizarse sin restricciones hasta el nacimiento.

En la actualidad, los abortos tardíos requieren una aprobación médica que se limita a los casos de malformación grave del feto o cuando el embarazo pone en peligro la vida de la madre, pero la nueva ley ampliaría esta segunda forma de aborto para incluir los casos en que la madre sufre "trastornos psicosociales".

En su votación de la semana pasada para reformar la ley de bioética del país, la Asamblea Nacional también aprobó la procreación artificial financiada por los contribuyentes para parejas de lesbianas, embriones genéticamente modificados y quimeras.

El grupo francés pro-vida Alliance Vita subrayó que la angustia psicosocial es un "criterio no verificable", que abre la puerta para que las mujeres se hagan un aborto médico por cualquier razón.

"Aquellos que saben que NUNCA ha sido posible verificar la angustia, que fue el motivo para el aborto voluntario, entenderán dónde está la trampa", escribió Tugdual Derville, fundador de Alliance Vita.

Comentando los resultados de la votación, el obispo Bernard Ginoux de Montauban tweeteó que "esta es la forma en que las civilizaciones mueren y el genio de los pueblos es aniquilado", añadiendo que las generaciones futuras "están en gran peligro".

Los obispos también expresaron su consternación por el hecho de que de los 577 diputados de la Asamblea Nacional, poco más de 100 se presentaron a la votación, para una ley que sanciona "las principales transgresiones éticas" que han sido rechazadas por la Asamblea General de Bioética.

En la actualidad, en Francia se practican cada año unos 220.000 abortos legales, pero muchos temen que el número aumente con las nuevas enmiendas que ampliarían el acceso a los abortos tardíos.

Después de su aprobación por la Asamblea Nacional, el proyecto de ley volverá al Senado para una segunda lectura.

Un comité conjunto de las dos cámaras votará la ley a finales de este año, pero si no se llega a un consenso, la decisión de la Asamblea Nacional se considerará definitiva.


Breitbart

(https://religionlavozlibre.blogspot.com/2020/08/la-asamblea-n-francesa-aprueba-el.html)

lunes, 3 de agosto de 2020

Volvió a hablar la viróloga que escapó de China: “El coronavirus provino de un laboratorio militar del Partido Comunista chino”

Domingo, 02 de Agosto de 2020 17:36

Li Meng Yan, en una nueva entrevista desde EEUU,



Una viróloga china que huyó a los Estados Unidos porque  temía que la mataran afirmó que el coronavirus ?provenía de un laboratorio militar de China. La doctora Li Meng-Yan, especialista en virología en la Escuela de Salud Pública de Hong Kong, dijo que "evaluó claramente" que el Covid-19 provenía de un laboratorio vinculado al Ejército Popular de Liberación.

China se enfrentó previamente a acusaciones de que cubrió los primeros días del brote de coronavirus y rechazó con enojo las afirmaciones de que el virus pudo provenir de un laboratorio. Sin embargo, la doctora Li afirmó que la fuente del brote fue en un laboratorio militar mientras se estudiaba la transmisión del virus de persona a persona.

Durante una nueva entrevista en vivo con Lude Press, afirmó que no la tomaron en serio cuando informó sus hallazgos a su jefe, informó Taiwan News. La doctora Li dijo: "En ese momento, había evaluado claramente que el virus provenía de un laboratorio militar del Partido Comunista Chino. El mercado húmedo de Wuhan solo se usó como señuelo". Hace dos semanas, había marcado una postura similar durante una entrevista exclusiva con Fox News.

Esta nueva información fue publicada en las últimas horas por el diario británico The Sun. Actualmente, los científicos creen que el virus puede haberse originado en un mercado húmedo en Wuhan que pasó de los animales a los humanos.

Li-Meng Yan escapó el 28 de abril a Estados Unidos. Desde allí hizo una denuncia terrible sobre el coronavirus.
Li-Meng Yan escapó el 28 de abril a Estados Unidos. Desde allí hizo una denuncia terrible sobre el coronavirus.


Según su testimonio, la doctora Li temía que si ella hablaba en China iba a ser secuestrada, así que decidió huir en abril desde Hong Kong a Estados Unidos. Yan, ahora escondida en algún lugar de EE.UU, afirma que el gobierno en el país donde nació está tratando de destruir su reputación y acusa al gobierno chino de armar ataque contra ella en las redes sociales con la esperanza de mantenerla callada.

Yan cree que su vida está en peligro. Teme no poder volver a su casa y vive con la dura verdad de que probablemente nunca volverá a ver a sus amigos o familiares allí en China. Aún así, dice ella, el riesgo vale la pena. "La razón por la que vine a los Estados Unidos es porque entrego el mensaje de la verdad del Covid-19", dijo.

Li-Meng Yan trabajaba en Hong Kong, pero debió huir.
Li-Meng Yan trabajaba en Hong Kong, pero debió huir.


"Sabía que una vez que hablara, podría desaparecer en cualquier momento, al igual que todos los valientes manifestantes en Hong Kong", dijo. "Podría desaparecer en cualquier momento. Incluso mi nombre ya no existiría", agregó.

La Universidad de Hong Kong negó previamente que haya llevado a cabo una investigación sobre la transmisión de la enfermedad de persona a persona, y dijo que las afirmaciones de la viróloga no “concuerdan con los hechos clave”.

La pandemia se originó en Wuhan, China. Y de allí se expandió al mundo. Foto: AFP.
La pandemia se originó en Wuhan, China. Y de allí se expandió al mundo.


Según Yan, toda la información que apuntaba a que se trataba de un virus de alta peligrosidad estaba en conocimiento no solo del gobierno chino, sino que también de la OMS?, mucho antes de que se dieran las alertas internacionales.

Desde que se produjo la pandemia de coronavirus, el gobierno chino se enfrentó a acusaciones de que trató de silenciar a cualquiera que haya intentado dar la alarma.

Los médicos informaron haber sido detenidos después de hablar en las redes sociales sobre lo que estaban presenciando, mientras que los periodistas relataron haber sido acosados ??y confiscados sus equipos después de tratar de informar sobre el tema.

El virus se propagó desde China y hasta ahora infectó a 18 millones de personas en todo el mundo y mató a 700,000. China niega rotundamente cualquier acusación de comportamiento inapropiado sobre su manejo de la pandemia, pero Estados Unidos ?continúa criticando al gobierno chino.

El presidente de los Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, sigue llamando a la pandemia ?el "virus de China" y acusó al país oriental de encubrimiento.

La administración Trump incluso fue más lejos como para sugerir que el patógeno podría ser hecho por el hombre, y dijo tener "evidencia". China registró 84.385 casos y 4.634 muertes, mientras que EE.UU. sufrió 4,7 millones de casos y 158.000 muertes. /Clarín